« GRESB Launches 2013 Survey on Sustainability Performance in Real Estate Sector | Main | The Capital Vintage Paradox and Ceres panel on "ESG & Real Estate" »

04/29/2013

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Nadavbg

Nice review, Nils. Regarding that last "study", why not just come out and say it? That report was funded by an industry group with a very specific agenda (to discourage Boston from enacting energy-reporting mandates like those in NYC and other places). It seems clear to me that they had to stretch really far to find data that they could use to make their case--like that one old, marginally relevant Danish study you mentioned.

While I would agree that there is not yet good data that energy labeling works--it's simply too new for that--there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that it is changing the conversation around energy use in buildings, in a good way.

Thanks for exposing more of its many weaknesses.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Skype

Skype Me™!

LinkedIn profile

View Nils Kok's profile on LinkedIn